Showing posts with label jamal murray. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jamal murray. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

2016 NBA Mock Lottery

Now that we know the official draft order (which it turns out we already knew) and the top of the draft class seems to be crystallizing as far as who will be remaining in the draft and who will be returning to school. It is still to early to know very much about what will actually happen, but information has been slowly leaking out as to the strategies of both teams and players. After the first two picks in the draft (Brandon Ingram and Ben Simmons in some order), things could go off script quickly as teams have wildly differing views of the potential of this draft. Some value experience and production more, others look for upside and potential. Those two groups rarely intersect in this draft, leading to disparate rankings depending on what aspects you value more.

01. Philadelphia 76ers: Brandon Ingram, SF Duke (6-9, 196) Age: 18
Once Sam Hinkie was ousted, it appeared conventional NBA wisdom was going to reign supreme, leading to the logical conclusion that Ben Simmons, the traditional "star-power" in the draft, the big name that could get fans excited and put rears in the seats would be the direction Philadelphia would look to go in. However, with the new that Simmons and his agent are trying to force their way to LA (as reported by Nick DePaula of The Vertical), it now appears that Ingram will be the direction they will go in, unless Simmons changes course and is willing to go to Philadelphia and be a model citizen and teammate. This isn't the worst thing for the Sixers, as Inrgam is a better fit on and off the court, mainly because he is a lock to play small forward and is the type of shooter that the Sixers have been desperate for, two things that cannot be said with certainty about Simmons.

02. Los Angeles Lakers: Ben Simmons, PF LSU (6-10, 240) Age: 19
This is an ideal scenario for the Lakers, as they get a highly marketable young player to fill the Mamba-sized left by Kobe Bryant and someone that will be easy to sell stars on playing with because he is such a willing and capable passer. The fit alongside Julius Randle is tenuous at best, and the dearth of shooting in LA is an issue, but those are all secondary concerns to LA. I would expect Simmons to be installed in a similar role as Draymond Green in new coach Luke Walton's DubSoCal offense. Defensively, he isn't a tenth of Green yet so there will be a need to figure things out around him there. LA will need a strong defensive center and role man to make best use of Simmons, as well as shooters to balance the floor and probably a good defender at small forward as well. Again, this is all of secondary concern to LA, who desperately need to re-ignite their franchise after the wasteland of the last couple seasons.

03. Boston Celtics (from Brooklyn): Jakob Poeltl, C Utah (7-1, 239) Age: 20
I could be totally wrong, but I get the feeling there is no way that Dragan Bender is the number 3 pick or Boston Celtics have the rights to Dragan Bender by the end of the summer. Now that could mean they trade the pick as part of a package for an established player, or to someone who falls in love with a prospect and sees how ugly this draft is and tries to get the guy they think could be a star, which I don't see being Bender. It also means if the Celtics pick here, they aren't taking Bender. They could (and should, in my opinion) but I just don't see it. Danny Ainge has eschewed foreign players in the past and I don't know why Bender would change his mind considering he is so young and is getting few minutes right now. There is also the question of message, Ainge has been selling his fans on all these assets and making the big move to get a star for years, and hasn't really gotten close, nor have they made it out of the first round of the playoffs with their current roster either. Is Ainge really going to take a project big man that might not even come over right away and when he does, still not be ready? That seems unlikely. So if not Bender, and not a trade, who? There are a number of options, none of which is particularly appealing but Poeltl is the best of the bunch. He is a Steven Adams type of center that isn't flashy but has few weaknesses but makes winning plays. Poeltl is the kind of big man Boston has lacked since Brad Stevens' arrival. The fact that Ainge went to BYU and Poeltl played for Utah, well...

04. Phoenix Suns: Dragan Bender, PF Maccabi Tel Aviv (7-1, 225) Age: 18
This would be ideal for Phoenix, as Bender is exactly the kind of player they need. A dirty-work type of guy who can defend at a high level and projects as a good enough shooter to space the floor. However, with Phoenix it is always dicey, how will they view themselves? As just a young piece away from contention, unwilling to wait to develop a player like Bender? If so, a more pro-ready player might be more of what they consider, such as Buddy Hield. However, if they are willing to be patient and form their team around a young core of Devin Booker and a prospect like Bender (as they should) then they will be looking a different batch of prospects, like Bender or Jaylen Brown. Seriously though, the marketing of the Killer Bs in Booker, Bender and Bledsoe? Worth it just for that. Then what if they traded up and drafted Brown? Then drafted Ben Bentil and Joel Bolomboy? Okay, I'll stop.

05. Minnesota Timberwolves: Jamal Murray, SG Kentucky (6-4, 207) Age: 19
The Timberwolves, exploding with young talent, will have a chance to add another peice to their world domination plan. With four of their starting five set, Minnesota could look towards a power forward to fill the void there, and players like Deyonta Davis and Marquese Chriss certainly make some sense there, they shouldn't force it in the power forward spot, especially since they might want a more veteran player there, via free agency. Instead, improving their shooting should be a priority. If Tom Thibodeau wants someone with more defensive potential that will be ready to step in early on, Buddy Hield makes a ton of sense. However, if they are targeting upside, Jamal Murray seems like a logical fit that could really help stabilize the second unit in the future. A sweet shooting combo guard that can create a little and would give them another scoring option on the perimeter. Murray is probably best suited to the bench, at least early on because he has yet to show he can consistent create against athletic defenders yet and wouldn't face the best of the best NBA guards playing second units.

06. New Orleans Pelicans: Kris Dunn, PG Providence (6-4, 205) Age: 22
Outside of Jrue Holiday, is there an above-average, healthy player on New Orleans' roster? Anthony Davis doesn't even fit into that category. The Pelicans have completely wasted a top five player with terrible trades, signings, and the possibly the league's worst medical staff. Now that they finally have a draft pick again, the Pelicans can start their rebuild, provided they can get out of their own first. Hield would make sense here, as would any of the power forwards in the draft. However if Kris Dunn falls this far (which seems likely given the lack of need for a point guard among the picks above), he seems like the most logical direction for New Orleans, that struggled to defend and create offense last season, two thing that Dunn should help with. Plus, with his size and length, Dunn should be able to function alongside Holiday, but without the pressures of leading the offense until ready.

07. Denver Nuggets (from New York): Jaylen Brown, SF California (6-7, 223) Age: 19
The Nuggets have so many young players on their rosters and three picks in the first round of this draft, so they have a great deal of flexibility. One of the options they have with so much draft capital is to take a risk or two. Jaylen Brown is risky because he hasn't put it all together on the floor yet. However, his physical tools are outstanding and he fits into the small-ball revolution as a potential small forward. With Danilo Gallinari's future far from certain, a combo forward like Brown could be groomed as his replacement in a year or two, filling the role of shot creator and foul-drawer in Denver. It will also be crucial that Brown ends up a team where he isn't under pressure to be a large role right away and has the time to develop and ease into the league.

08. Sacramento Kings: Buddy Hield, SG Oklahoma (6-5, 212) Age: 22
The Kings have to be hoping that Hield is available here, he is really an ideal fit for what they need both on and off the court. Sacramento had a really big spacing issue last season, as well as another drama filled season in the front office, coaching staff, and players. Hield is as close to an NBA ready shooting guard as you are going to find, he is an excellent outside shooter and has the tools to be a good defensive player. Perhaps even more importantly, Hield is a high character, hard-working player that gets along well with teammates and would be a step in the right direction when it comes to rebuilding the culture in Sacramento.

09. Toronto Raptors (from Denver): Deyonta Davis, F/C Michigan (6-11, 237) Age: 19
The Raptors, benefiting from the Knicks mistakes, get a rare chance to add a top ten pick to a conference finals team. With Bismack Biyombo's impending free agency and a hole already existing at power forward for Toronto, they will have their choice of several big man options here if they so choose. I have always been an advocate for good teams swinging for the fences when given the chance to draft high, in which case Marquese Chriss or Skal Labissiere would be possibilities, has however if they wish to go a safer route, Henry Ellenson provides a more stable floor. In this scenario, they split the difference with Deyonta Davis, a physically blessed big man who still has a ton of room to grow, but also with the floor of a solid rebounder/defender with potential for a nice perimeter game with some polish down the road. Add to that the size to play center and you have a logical choice for Toronto.

10. Milwaukee Bucks: Skal Labissiere, PF Kentucky (7-0, 216) Age: 20
The Bucks seem to favor high upside talent and the upside doesn't get much higher than Skal Labissiere. Also, because the two foundational young pieces on their roster (Giannis Antetokounmpo and Jabari Parker) are both for the most part inside the three-point line players, it makes a lot of sense to look to add someone like Labissiere who has a wonderful stroke that should work from the three point line eventually. Labissiere is a work in progress in many areas, but Milwaukee has shown a willingness to draft and develop raw players and would seem to be a good landing place for Labissiere, who needs patience and confidence from a coach willing to us him in the areas he excels, things he didn't get at Kentucky.

11. Orlando Magic: Demetrius Jackson, PG Notre Dame (6-2, 194) Age: 21
Don't be surprised if this pick ends up in a deal, as Orlando seems done with rebuilding and want to go all in with free agency this summer and may look to trade for pieces as well. If they use this pick, they might shoot for the high upside talent GM Rob Hennigan has favored in the past of they could look for more instant contribution. Demetrius Jackson certainly has upside, but he is further along in his development than say a Marquese Chriss. Orlando clearly thinks Elfrid Payton is the point guard of their future (despite much evidence to the contrary) which was a primary reason for Scott Skiles resignation. However, they lack any kind of quality backup, which is a role Jackson should be able to play early on in his career. Also, because of his shooting ability and Payton's size, the two could easily play alongside one another, if Orlando insists on playing a point guard with a .478 TS%.

12. Utah Jazz: Wade Baldwin IV, PG Vanderbilt (6-3, 202) Age: 20
The Jazz missed out on the playoffs last season in large part because of terrible point guard play. Now, part of that wasn't there fault due to Dante Exum's unfortunate injury, but relying inexperienced Exum, coming off a serious knee injury seem pa the height of folly without a backup plan. Wade Baldwin IV probably isn't ready to lead an NBA offense, but in Utah he wouldn't have to. The Jazz have many creators on the wing who could supplement Baldwin until he is more comfortable as the lead guard, leaving him free to knock down 3s (something he did with a greater than 40% success rate in college) and use his size, athletic ability and absurd 6-11+ wingspan to defend. Both he and Exum can play alongside one another, giving Utah two versatile players how can both shoot and defend, something their point struggled to do last season.

13. Phoenix Suns (from Washington): Henry Ellenson, PF Marquette (7-0, 242) Age: 19
If they make more of a long term investment at power forward at pick 4, the Suns could use their second of three first rounders on a more immediate contributor, whether that be a wing like Timothe Luwawu or Denzel Valentine or a big man in the vein of Henry Ellenson. If their first pick is a safer prospect, they could take a high upside flier on the likes of Marquese Chriss or Skal Labissiere. Ellenson has a ways to go defensively, but he has the tools to be average in that area, which is all he would need to be because of his versatile offensive skillset and rebounding. Though he shot poorly from deep in college, Ellenson projects as an above-average stretch big with the additional playmaking and post-scoring abilities of a modern NBA big man.

14. Chicago Bulls: Marquese Chriss, PF Washington (6-10, 233) Age: 18
Though they will likely never admit to it, the Bulls are entering a different phase of their franchise history, one that is closer to rebuilding than contending. With the all but inevitable departures of Joakim Noah and Pau Gasol, the Bulls frontcourt will need to be rebuilt around Bobby Portis, Christiano Felicio, Taj Gibson, and Nikola Mirotic, the first two of which are unproven, while the latter two are flawed in one way or another. Marquese Chriss certainly has a higher upside than any of them, though he is still very early on in his development and might take some time to adjust and learn the NBA game. However, if it all clicks you have a tremendously athletic power forward that can both shoot the ball and attack the basket off the dribble. He isn't in the usual "proven college player" mold the Bulls like, but at this point he is too good to pass up on. The Bulls could also use a point guard and a wing that can both shoot and defend, meaning they will take a long look at the likes of Demetrius Jackson, Wade Baldwin IV, Timothe Luwawu, and Denzel Valentine.

Follow me at twitter.com/double_tech

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

2016 NBA Draft: Top 50 Rankings

These rankings try to balance upside and risk, it could be flip-flopped how you like depending on if you value upside or safety. In this draft, which is pretty weak overall as we see it now, I lean toward safety but last year, I leaned upside. It really depends on personal preference and the particular draft. Player comparisons are inherently silly, but they are presented to give you an idea of the style of play, strengths, and weaknesses of each player. The designations of #x scorer or #x creator refers to the players on the floor, not on a team. So Buddy Hield wouldn't be the #2/3 scorer on a team, but of the players on the floor at the time, he could be. Enjoy! 

Tier 1: Potential Perennial All-NBA
None. 

Tier 2: Potential All-Stars
01. Brandon Ingram, SF Duke
Upside: #1/2 scorer, plus defensive player
Risk: Body doesn't develop, lack of plus first step causes issues creating shots
Player Comparison: Rashard Lewis

02. Ben Simmons, PF LSU
Upside: #1 creator, #2/3 scorer, plus rebounder, average defensive player
Risk: Shot never develops, allowing teams to lay off and clog the lane, unable to score in half-court, effort on defense doesn't improve, lack of length leads to poor defense 
Player Comparison: Lamar Odom

Tier 3: Potential Plus Rotation Players
03. Dragan Bender, PF Maccabi Tel Aviv
Upside: Plus-Plus defensive player, #3 scorer
Risk: Body and jump shot don't develop
Player Comparison: Andrei Kirilenko

04. Jaylen Brown, SF California
Upside: Plus defensive player, #2/3 scorer
Risk: Jump shots fails to develop.      
Player Comparison: Justise Winslow

05. Kris Dunn, PG Providence
Upside: #1 creator, Plus-plus defensive player, #3 scorer
Risk: Injuries crop back up, jumpshot never becomes consistent, turnovers 
Player Comparison: bigger Derek Harper

06. Jamal Murray, SG Kentucky
Upside: #2/3 scorer, #2 creator, average defensive player
Risk: Average athleticism limits creation and defense
Player Comparison: Somewhere between O.J. Mayo and D'Angelo Russell

07. Henry Ellenson, PF Marquette
Upside: #2 scorer, plus rebounder, average defensive player
Risk: Jumper never comes around, struggled versus length, below average defensive player
Player Comparison: Nikola Mirotic

08. Jakob Poeltl, C Utah
Upside: Plus defensive player, plus rebounder, #4 scorer
Risk: Post game never translates, skill doesn't develop
Player Comparison: Steven Adams

09. Wade Baldwin IV, PG Vanderbilt
Upside: Plus shooter, Plus defender, #3 scorer,  #1/2 creator
Risk: Fails to grow as a point guard, defensive tools don't turn into production
Player Comparison: Terry Porter

10. Furkan Korkmaz, SG Anadolu Efes
Upside: #2/3 scorer, plus shooter, above-average defender
Risk: Body doesn't develop, skill doesn't translate to NBA
Player Comparison: Kerry Kittles

11. Denzel Valentine, SG Michigan State
Upside: #3 scorer, #2 creator, plus shooter, average defender
Risk: Defensive issue relegate him to limited role
Player Comparison: better passing Matt Harpring

12. Buddy Hield, SG Oklahoma
Upside: #2/3 scorer, plus shooter, above-average defender
Risk: More a 35% three-point shooter than 40%, inattentivness on defense limits playing time
Player Comparison: Lindsey Hunter

13. Marquese Chriss, PF Washington
Upside: #3 scorer, above-average rebounder and defender, plus versatility
Risk: Body doesn't develop, shooting never because a weapon, never puts it all together
Player Comparison: Somewhere between James Michael McAdoo and Antwan Jamison

14. Demetrius Jackson, PG Notre Dame
Upside: #2 creator, above average shooter and defender
Risk: Lack of size/length contributes to defensive struggles, doesn't find scoring/passing balance
Player Comparison: Kyle Lowry

15. Timothe Luwawu, SF Mega Leks
Upside: #3/4 scorer, plus defender
Risk: Shooting improvements aren't for real
Player Comparison: Doug Christie

Tier 4: Potential Rotation Players
16. Ivan Rabb, PF California
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average defensive player and rebounder
Risk: Body doesn't develop, doesn't develop a dominant skill, never stands out
Player Comparison: Taj Gibson

17. Diamond Stone, C Maryland
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average rebound, average defender
Risk: Struggles against length/athleticism, passing/feel doesn't develop, defense limits playing time
Player Comparison: Greg Smith

18. Skal Labissiere, PF Kentucky
Upside: #2/3 big man, above-average to plus shooter, above-average defender
Risk: Body never develops, lack of strength and feel make him barely playable
Player Comparison: less skilled David West

19. Petr Cornelie, PF Le Mans
Upside: Backup power forward, plus shooter and plus defender
Risk: Strength and lack of length lead to defensive liabilities
Player Comparison: Channing Frye

23. Taurean Prince, SF Baylor
Upside: 3-and-D combo forward, above-average shooter and defender, plus rebounder
Risk: Shooting and defense don't translate
Player Comparison: Somewhere between Robert Covington and Trevor Ariza

21. Stephen Zimmerman Jr, C UNLV
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average offensive shooter, rebounder, and defensive player
Risk: No part of his game evolves, leaving a vanilla overall player
Player Comparison: Raef LaFrentz

22. Nigel Hayes, PF Wisconsin
Upside: Backup power forward, plus creator and shooter for a big, above-average defender
Risk: Overmatched against bigger players, shoots more around 30% from three rather than 35%+
Player Comparison: shorter, longer Nikola Mirotic

23. Melo Trimble, PG Maryland
Upside: #3/4 scorer and #2 creator
Risk: Lack of size/length limit offensive and defensive production
Player Comparison: B.J. Armstrong

24. Caris LeVert, SG Michigan
Upside: #3/4 scorer, #2 creator, plus shooter, average defensive player
Risk: Lower body injuries continue to plague his career, aggressiveness 
Player Comparison: Michael Finley

25. Domantas Sabonis, F/C Gonzaga
Upside: #3/4 big man, plus rebounder and finisher, above-average defensive player
Risk: Lack of physical advantages limit defensive upside and ability to finish vs. length
Player Comparison: P.J. Brown

26. Malik Beasley, SG Florida State
Upside: #3/4 scorer, plus shooter, above-average defensive player
Risk: Doesn't develop any in-between game or become more efficient from two point range
Player Comparison: Allen Crabbe

27. Monte Morris, PG Iowa State
Upside: #1 creator and above-average shooter
Risk: Lack of size and length limit defense and ability to finish
Player Comparison: Brian Roberts

28. Patrick McCaw, SG UNLV
Upside: #3/4 scorer, #2 creator, above-average shooter and defensive player
Risk: Body, strength, and shooting don't develop
Player Comparison: Will Barton

Tier 5: Risky, High Reward Prospects
29. Jonathan Jeanne, C Le Mans
Upside: #3 scorer, plus shooter, defensive player, and rebounder
Risk: Frail body doesn't develop, affecting every single aspect of his game

30. Thomas Bryant, C Indiana
Upside: #2/3 big man, plus rebounder, above-average defensive player
Risk: Doesn't improve his feel, pick and roll defense, or shooting

31. A.J. Hammons, C Purdue
Upside: #3 big man, plus rebounder, defensive player, and pick-and-roll player
Risk: Lack of feel and polish lead to underachieving, conditioning issues return

32. Cheick Diallo, C Kansas
Upside: #3/4 big man, plus-plus defensive player
Risk: Lack of polish and offensive game limit minutes severely 

33. Deyonta Davis, PF Michigan State
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average shooter for a big, plus rebounder and defensive player
Risk: Simply doesn't develop as an offensive or defensive player

34. Paul Zipser, SF Bayern Muenchen
Upside: #3/4 scorer, plus defender, above-average shooter
Risk: Shot doesn't develop or regresses, limiting his ability to drive or score

35. Ante Zizic, C Cibona Zagreb
Upside: #3/4 big man, plus rebounder and defensive player
Risk: Offense doesn't develop enough to play significant minutes

36. Zhou Qi, C Xinjiang
Upside: #2/3 big man, plus defensive player, above-average shooter for a big man
Risk: Frail body doesn't develop, affecting every single aspect of his game, toughness wanes

37. Juan Hernangomez, PF Estudiantes
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average shooter for a big, average defensive player
Risk: Lack of length and athletic ability limits both offense and defense
Player Comparison:

38. Gary Payton II, Oregon State
Upside: #2 creator, #3/4 scorer, plus-plus defensive player
Risk: Jumper limits offensive upside
 
39. Sviatoslav Mykhailiuk, SG Kansas
Upside: #3/4 scorer, plus shooter, above-average defensive player
Risk: Continues to fail to deliver on abilities

40. Ivica Zubac, C Mega Leks
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average defensive and pick-and-roll player
Risk: Offense and defense fail to develop to playable levels

Tier 6: Risky, Medium Reward Prospects
41. Chinanu Onuaku, C Louisville
Upside: #3/4 big man, plus defensive player and rebounder
Risk: Lack of offense makes him hard to play

42. Kay Felder, PG Oakland
Upside: #1 creator, plus shooter, average defensive player
Risk: Lack of size limits ability to score and defend

43. Tyler Ulis, PG Kentucky
Upside: #1 creator off bench, above-average shooter and average defensive player
Risk: Lack of size, bulk, and length limit ability to score and defend

44. Justin Jackson, SF North Carolina
Upside: #3 creator, #4 scorer, above-average shooter and defender
Risk: Fails to live up to abilities, continues to be a bad shoot, doesn't mature physically

45. Grayson Allen, SG Duke
Upside: #3/4 scorer, plus shooter, above-average defender
Risk: Doesn't live up to tools and continues to be a poor defender, driving ability doesn't develop

46. Isaiah Briscoe, G Kentucky
Upside: #2 creator, plus defensive player
Risk: Terrible shooting makes him unplayable

47. Brice Johnson, PF North Carolina
Upside: #3/4 big man, plus rebounder, above-average pick-and-roll finisher
Risk: Body fails to develop, lack of defense makes him difficult to play

48. Malik Newman, SG Mississippi State
Upside: #3/4 scorer, plus shooter
Risk: Never becomes more than a one-diamensional gunner that isn't even that good at gunning

49. Jake Layman, PF Maryland
Upside: #3/4 big man, above-average shooter and creator, as a power forward
Risk: Plays more as a wing and doesn't have the ability to score against wings

50. Damian Jones, PF Vanderbilt
Upside: #3/4 big man, plus defensive player
Risk: Lack of feel continues to limit his production and rebounding

Follow me on Twitter @double_tech

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

2016 NBA Draft: Initial Point Guard Rankings


A couple of notes: the asterisk(*) denotes a player also in the shooting guard ranking. The age listed is that of the player on the night of the 2016 draft. The measurements are what their colleges list them as. This ranking is as point guards, so while I might think Jamal Murray is a better prospect overall than Kris Dunn, he doesn't project as well to the point guard position, in my opinion, and Dunn does. Same with Demetrius Jackson and Malik Newman.

01. Kris Dunn, Providence (6-4, 220) Age: 22
Dunn is he best player in college basketball this season and should have a monster year. There isn't quite a lot that he cannot do on the court, he is explosive in transition, super-aggressive getting penetration, has pure point guard passing ability, can shoot 3s, has great size and length, is a good defender and great at stealing the ball. His age and a past of injury concerns are the only drawbacks to his game. Sit back and enjoy his last year in college and prepare yourself for him to bring his explosive style of play to the NBA.

02. Jamal Murray, Kentucky (6-5, 207) Age: 19*
No one had a bigger summer than Jamal Murray, breaking out at the Hoops Summit and Pan Am games playing for Canada an then reclassifying to the class of 2015 and heading to Kentucky. Murray is a score first player with the size to play either guard spot, he ultimately is probably better suited to playing off the ball because he is such a good scorer/shooter and might not quite have the athletic ability to stick with quicker point guards. Murray's crafty, skillful scoring and ability to get super-hot from deep should be a pleasure to watch, but keep an eye on his decision-making and defense to get an idea what position he ultimately might be best suited for in the NBA.

03. Demetrius Jackson, Notre Dame (6-1, 198) Age: 21
Jackson played last season off the ball next to Jerian Grant but this year, with Grant off to the NBA he will take the reigns as the lead guard for the Irish, his natural position. Jackson is the second best "pure" point guard prospect going into the season and he really doesn't have many holes to his game aside from somewhat less than ideal physical attributes. If he can flourish in an expanded role with the ball in his hands this season, Jackson could cement himself as a possible lottery pick.

04. Malik Newman, Mississippi State (6-3, 190) Age: 19*
Newman is a rare top-10 recruit to choose to Mississippi State, now under new head coach Ben Howland. Newman is a score first type of guard that may be better suited to a become a C.J. McCollum-like off-guard next to a more traditional point guard so he is free to look for his own shot while also making plays for others at times though he is a great athlete, Newman isn't particularly long and may be no taller than 6-4 so he'll need to shot he is able to guard bigger players if he wants to be considered a starting level player. Newman is awesome at getting to the rim and scores in a variety of ways; he isn't a traditional passer but can find teammates off of the disruption his attacking play creates.

05. Isaiah Briscoe, Kentucky (6-3, 202) Age: 20*
Briscoe is definitely scorer first, and like Newman he might have to play off the ball if his point guard skills aren't up to snuff. Briscoe needs to improve his outside shooting and show he can be an efficient scorer and solid defensive player, especially when checking bigger players off the ball in order to be considered for the lottery. He isn't super athletic but has long 6-8+ wingspan and is skilled, crafty, and smooth particularly getting to the rim and finishing.

06. Jalen Brunson, Villanova (6-3, 199) Age: 19
A higher regarded recruit than Villanova usually lands, Jalen Brunson will be inserted directly into a big role on a top ten team and he has the skills to run with it, but will also have some pressure on him to produce. Brunson has nice size for the position, knows how to change speeds and get to the basket, is excellent in the pick-and-roll and shoots the ball well. He is similar to Tyus Jones last season as a polished point guard, however he also lacks top-end athletic ability and length to be a truly devastating offensive player but is good enough in that area to project as an average or better starter because he does so much else well.

07. Monte Morris, Iowa State (6-2, 170) Age: 20
After a promising but mostly unremarkable Freshman season, Monte Morris broke out as a Sophomore leading Iowa State's fast-paced offense; if he can take another step forward he'll really cement himself on NBA radars as a potential first-round pick. Offensively he is a well-rounded point guard that has shot 40% from 3 so far in his career with a sparkling 4.7 assist-to-turnover ratio despite playing in an uptempo offense. To take that next step, he needs to start shoot more 3s while maintaining the same percentage, continue to develop his driving and finishing ability in the half-court, and become a more consistent defensive player. Continued physical development will also help.

08. Melo Trimble, Maryland (6-3, 185) Age: 21
Trimble had an excellent Freshman season and looks to carry that forward on a top five ranked Maryland team with a lot of scoring options. Trimble is much more of a scorer, ceding main point guard duties to Dez Wells last season, but this season Wells is gone and Trimble will have the opportunity to show he is more than just a scorer. Even if not, he might have a future in the NBA as an off-the-bench scoring guard because he is such an efficient offensive player that shot 40%+ from three and got to the line 6+ times a game, the two most efficient ways to score in basketball.

09. Tyrone Wallace, California (6-5, 205) Age: 22*
Wallace eschewed becoming potentially a late first-round pick to return to a loaded California team, with top recruits incoming. He doesn't really have a challenger at point guard so he'll get all the minutes he can handle an put up big numbers, scoring, rebounding, and setting up teammates. His actually on court game is a little bit more dicey, he needs to show a consistent jumpshot and prove he is an efficient playmaker that actually makes a positive influence on games and not just an empty stat guy who steals rebounds and stalls offense. With such a talented team around him, he'll have an opportunity to show he can lead a productive offense. Wallace does have the size to profile as an off-guard in the NBA, if his shooting comes around of course.

10. Derryck Thornton, Duke (6-2, 175) Age: 19
Thornton, a surprise re-classification into the class of 2015, Thornton might be one to file away for the 2017 or 18 draft because he has plenty of ability, but just has a little bit of maturing to do physically and on the court, mainly because he is more of a scorer but doesn't have the body to handle drives to the rim in the NBA yet, but also is more of a pull-up off-the-dribble inside the arc type of shooter at this point. If he gets the minutes this season and shows an improved jumpshot, Thornton could rise quickly in the eyes of NBA teams, but I would be on next year being his year.

11. Gary Payton II, Oregon State (6-3, 190) Age: 23*
The son of that Gary Payton, Gary Payton II has surprising upside despite his age, mainly because he is such a good, impactful defensive player; he averaged 3+ steals and over a block a game last season while still being excellent on ball. Offensively, he has a way to go buy has already made strides in that regard. Really, even if he just develops a consistent 35%-ish jumper, he'll be playable in a Patrick Beverly-type of way.

12. Tyler Ulis, Kentucky (5-9, 160) Age: 20
Ulis is a pure point guard with a tremendous ability to pressure the ball on defense that can also make outside shots. The problem is, of course, he is tiny and, despite the success of smaller players like Isaiah Thomas and Nate Robinson, those are exception. Ulis definitely could make it in the league, but it will probably be after four years in college, no just two; the risk of going undrafted is just too great. 

13. George de Paula, Pinheiros (6-6, 194) Age: 20
George de Paula is an enigma, with great size for a point guard and a 7-foot+ wingspan that allows him to be a very disruptive defensive player. The issues are everything else with his game, as de Paula is still learning the position. He pulled his name out of draft last season and will be in the mix as a draft-and-stash prospect in the second round, possibly late first if his shooting and point guard skills come along far enough.

14. Ron Baker, Wichita State (6-4, 220) Age: 23*
Baker has been a steady part of the Shockers backcourt for the last couple of seasons, where he plays more of an off-guard role next to Fred VanVleet. However, due to Baker's ballhandling ability and overall heady style of play, it is possible he could make the conversion to point guard, where his size, strength, and shooting ability could become a real asset. A Senior, Baker isn't a high upside prospect, but has a chance to settle in as a solid depth piece in the NBA.

15. Isaiah Taylor, Texas (6-1, 170) Age: 21
After a breakout Freshman season, Isaiah Taylor had a down Sophomore year due to both injuries and poor play. More of a scorer than a passer, Taylor makes his living driving to the basket and getting to the line. Unless he develops more of a jumpshot or becomes a better distributor, Taylor is probably too small and skinny to score the way he does in the NBA and not big enough to play as a shooting guard. However, in a more player-friendly system under new coach Shaka Smart, Taylor could flourish.

Follow me on Twitter @double_tech